SIP or PIP (SCHOOL or
PROFESSIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT) PLAN OF ACTION
SCHOOL VISION: Improvement on Standardized Test scores by
using benchmark testing data and intervention.


GOAL: To determine
if benchmark testing improves standardized testing results.
OUTCOMES
|
ACTIVITIES
|
RESOURCES/ RESEARCH TOOLS NEEDED
|
RESPONSIBILITY TO ADDRESS ACTIVITIES
|
TIME LINE
|
Benchmarks/
ASSESSMENT
|
Revisions to SIP/PIP based on monitoring and
assessments
|
Setting the Foundation: Looking at the disruption of
teaching time, schedules, lack of funding due to testing absences
|
Preparing to give required benchmark testing
|
Student report generator to research student and
teacher schedules for administering test.
|
Test facilitator, counselors,
secretaries
|
October, 2011
|
10th Grade ELA TAKS Reading and Writing Benchmark
tests
|
|
Analyzing Data: Determine students that will taking
the tests and classrooms
|
Complete review of 10th Grade ELA students
required through summary reports who are required to take the benchmark
testing, create scheduling for all students except our band students due to
scheduled trip.
|
Prepare student reports and schedules to determine
student assignments, modifications, small group locations for each student.
|
Test Facilitator
counselors
secretaries,
special education dept.
site mentor
|
October, 2011
|
10th Grade ELA TAKS Reading and Writing
Benchmark tests
|
|
Developing Deeper Understanding: Administrating10th
grade TAKS ELA Benchmark testing data
|
Administration of 10th Grade TAKS
Benchmark tests
|
TEA generated Benchmark Test examples and
documentations on how to create and grade questions for this test.
|
ELA Curriculum Specialist
Instructional Coach
Print shop
|
November, 2011
|
November, 2011 Test given
|
Waiting for TEA grading criteria
for essay portion of the tests.
|
Engaging in Self Reflection: Looking a researchers
and why the benchmark testing was created
|
Review websites and articles regarding why
benchmarks were established and what they mean to education
|
The Flaws, Fallacies and Foolishness of Benchmark
Testing;
Making
Benchmark Testing Work
|
Susan Martin
|
December, 2011
|
Data from Benchmark results
|
Waiting
for TEA grading criteria for essay portion of the tests.
|
Exploring Patterns: Reviewing data from benchmark
test
|
Compare 10th graders scores and look for
areas of weakness that needs addressing
|
Computer data report program and student analysis
data base
|
Susan Martin
Data coordinator
David Youngblood
|
December, 2011
|
Data from Benchmark Results
|
|
Determining Direction: Using the data from the
benchmark test will determine action
|
Move failing students into a intervention program
for Jan – Mar, 2012, re-teaching techniques for questions that were
consistency missed
|
Work with instructional coaches on test data from
and teachers classes compared to test scores,
Compare student report to prior scores
|
Susan Martin
Instructional Coach
David Youngblood
Russell Faldyn
|
December, 2011
|
Data from Benchmark Results
|
|
Taking Action: During March, 2012 actual TAKS test
is administrated
|
10th Grade TAKS test will be administered for sample students
|
TEA guidelines and regulations for administrating
the test, teachers trained for monitoring and students prepared for test
|
Susan Martin, Testing Facilitator
counselors,
secretaries,
teachers,
students
Russell Faldyn
|
March, 2012
|
10th grade TAKS ELA reading and writing
Test.
|
|
Sustaining Improvement: Review of the outcome of the 10th Grade ELA TAKS Reading and Writing Test
|
Compare data from the benchmark tests and the actual
March TAKS Tests, see where there were discrepancies and adjust for these in
the new teaching curriculum
|
Student data reports, TEA test results
Work with instructional coaches comparing benchmark
test data and actual test scores.
|
Susan Martin
Instructional Coach
Russell Faldyn
David Youngblood
|
June, 2012
|
Data from ELA 10th Grade TAKS Test
|